Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.
BAER Industrials Security & Protection Services
Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $122.8 million, up 24.6% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue was flat, EPS fell 8.33%, free cash flow fell 9,846.9% and total debt rose 15.9%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Revenue growth for three consecutive years; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow BAER
Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. (BAER) Piotroski F-score
Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 6 out of 9: 6 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, up from 5 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 6 | 1.00 |
| FY2024 | 5 | 0.00 |
| FY2023 | 5 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (7.39%) | (14.50%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 16.73m | 9.36m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | (7.39%) | (14.50%) | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 39.67m | 50.26m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.68 | 0.72 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 2.43 | 2.73 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 54,283,000 | 50,525,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 42.08% | 41.72% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.40 | 0.35 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 6 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| BAER Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. | 6 |
| SNT Senstar Technologies Ltd. compare | 6 |
| OPNW OpenWorld, Inc. compare | 5 |
| CIGL Concorde International Group Ltd. compare | 5 |
| SPCB SuperCom, Ltd. compare | 5 |
| KSCP Knightscope, Inc. compare | 4 |
| SUGP SU Group Holdings Limited compare | 4 |
| BKYI BIO-key International Inc. compare | 3 |
| GFAI Guardforce AI Co., Limited compare | 3 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover