Pagaya Technologies Ltd.
PGY Technology Software Infrastructure
Pagaya Technologies Ltd.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $1.3 billion, up 26.1% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 18.6%, EPS grew 165.0%, free cash flow grew 33.1% and total debt rose 25.0%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Revenue growth for five consecutive years, operating cash flow growth for three; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow PGY
Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (PGY) Altman Z-score
Pagaya Technologies Ltd.'s Altman Z-score for fiscal 2025 is 2.62, in the grey zone (1.81–2.99).
Altman Z-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Altman Z-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 2.62 | 1.23 |
| FY2024 | 1.39 | 0.08 |
| FY2023 | 1.30 | 0.38 |
| FY2022 | 0.92 | (2.84) |
| FY2021 | 3.77 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Component | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital / total assets | 0.81 | — | 0.97 | |
| Retained earnings / total assets | (0.56) | — | −0.78 | |
| EBIT / total assets | 0.17 | — | 0.56 | |
| Market value of equity / total liabilities | 1.70 | — | 1.02 | |
| Sales / total assets | 0.84 | — | 0.84 | |
| Altman Z-score | Grey zone | 2.62 | ||
| Z″ Variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies (drops the sales/assets term, uses book equity) | Safe zone | 5.30 | ||
Z and Z″ put Pagaya Technologies Ltd. in different zones: grey zone by Z, safe zone by Z″.
How the Altman Z-score works
Z = 1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets (Altman, 1968). The market value of equity is the close on the last trading day of the fiscal year times weighted basic shares.
Z″ = 6.56 × working capital ÷ total assets + 3.26 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 6.72 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 1.05 × book equity ÷ total liabilities (Altman, Hartzell and Peck, 1995), the variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies.
| Zone | Z | Z″ |
|---|---|---|
| Safe zone | above 2.99 | above 2.60 |
| Grey zone | 1.81–2.99 | 1.10–2.60 |
| Distress zone | below 1.81 | below 1.10 |
Not worked out for banks, insurers and REITs, whose balance sheets the model does not describe, nor when a figure is missing or there is no share price in the week to the fiscal year end.
Altman Z-score against peers
| Company | Altman Z-score |
|---|---|
| RDWR Radware Ltd. compare | 3.2× |
| ATEN A10 Networks, Inc. compare | 3.2× |
| NYAX Nayax Ltd. compare | 2.9× |
| PGY Pagaya Technologies Ltd. | 2.6× |
| EVTC Evertec, Inc. compare | 2.0× |
| BAND Bandwidth Inc. compare | 1.1× |
| PRGS Progress Software Corporation compare | 1.0× |
| NN NextNav Inc. compare | −2.2× |
| FORG ForgeRock, Inc. compare | — |
What Altman Z-score is
The Altman Z-Score weighs working capital, retained earnings, operating profit, market value and sales against assets and debts to gauge the risk of distress.
1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets