Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.
EVLV Industrials Security & Protection Services
Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $145.9 million, up 40.5% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 34.4%, EPS grew 80.0% and free cash flow grew 203.9%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Revenue growth for five consecutive years; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow EVLV
Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (EVLV) Piotroski F-score
Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 4 out of 9: 4 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 5 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 4 | (1.00) |
| FY2024 | 5 | 1.00 |
| FY2023 | 4 | 2.00 |
| FY2022 | 2 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (11.58%) | (19.11%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 18.67m | (30.85m) | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | (11.58%) | (19.11%) | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 51.81m | 23.16m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.10 | 0.00 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.23 | 1.26 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 168,419,200 | 156,573,900 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 51.61% | 57.25% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.51 | 0.37 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 4 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| CXW CoreCivic, Inc. compare | 7 |
| NSSC NAPCO Security Technologies, Inc. compare | 7 |
| CIX CompX International Inc. compare | 7 |
| BRC Brady Corporation compare | 7 |
| GEO Geo Group Inc (The) compare | 6 |
| BCO Brink's Company (The) compare | 6 |
| MG Mistras Group Inc compare | 5 |
| NL NLI Holdings, Inc. compare | 4 |
| EVLV Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. | 4 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover