Twin Disc, Incorporated
TWIN Industrials Specialty Industrial Machinery
Twin Disc, Incorporated’s revenue for fiscal 2026 (year ended June 2026) was $381.3 million, up 11.9% from fiscal 2025. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 18.3%, EPS fell 25.8%, free cash flow grew 95.3% and total debt fell 5.20%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for three consecutive years, revenue growth for five.
Follow TWIN
Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) Piotroski F-score
Twin Disc, Incorporated's Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2026 is 5 out of 9: 5 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, up from 3 in fiscal 2025.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | 5 | 2.00 |
| FY2025 | 3 | (3.00) |
| FY2024 | 6 | 1.00 |
| FY2023 | 5 | 0.00 |
| FY2022 | 5 | 0.00 |
| FY2021 | 5 | 2.00 |
| FY2020 | 3 | 1.00 |
| FY2019 | 2 | (4.00) |
| FY2018 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2017 | 6 | — |
How fiscal 2026’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 6.86% | (0.20%) | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 22.90m | 23.98m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 6.86% | (0.20%) | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | (4.18m) | 24.68m | Fail | 0 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.07 | 0.08 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 2.35 | 2.22 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 14,119,000 | 13,856,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 26.90% | 27.56% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.97 | 0.97 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 5 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| OFLX Omega Flex, Inc. compare | 6 |
| LXFR Luxfer Holdings PLC compare | 6 |
| PKOH Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. compare | 5 |
| TWIN Twin Disc, Incorporated | 5 |
| RR Richtech Robotics Inc. compare | 3 |
| SERV Serve Robotics Inc. compare | 3 |
| NPWR NET Power Inc. compare | 2 |
| SHMD SCHMID Group N.V. compare | — |
| NNE Nano Nuclear Energy Inc. compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover