Oxford Industries, Inc.
OXM Consumer Cyclical Apparel Manufacturing
Oxford Industries, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2026 (year ended January 2026) was $1.5 billion, down 2.56% from fiscal 2025. In the quarter to July 2026, revenue fell 2.17%, EPS grew 192.9%, free cash flow grew 54.1% and total debt fell 9.99%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for five consecutive years; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow OXM
Oxford Industries, Inc. (OXM) Piotroski F-score
Oxford Industries, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2026 is 3 out of 9: 3 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 4 in fiscal 2025.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | 3 | (1.00) |
| FY2025 | 4 | (3.00) |
| FY2024 | 7 | 0.00 |
| FY2023 | 7 | (1.00) |
| FY2022 | 8 | 4.00 |
| FY2021 | 4 | 1.00 |
| FY2020 | 3 | (3.00) |
| FY2019 | 6 | 1.00 |
| FY2018 | 5 | (1.00) |
| FY2017 | 6 | — |
How fiscal 2026’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (2.15%) | 7.79% | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 119.65m | 194.03m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | (2.15%) | 7.79% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 147.54m | 101.06m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.09 | 0.03 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.10 | 1.18 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 14,963,000 | 15,665,000 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 60.75% | 62.94% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 1.14 | 1.27 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 3 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| VNCE Vince Holding Corp. compare | 6 |
| SGC Superior Group of Companies, Inc. compare | 5 |
| GIII G-III Apparel Group, LTD. compare | 5 |
| JRSH Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. compare | 5 |
| JXG Aquaron Acquisition Corp. compare | 4 |
| OXM Oxford Industries, Inc. | 3 |
| UA Under Armour, Inc. compare | 2 |
| UAA Under Armour, Inc. compare | 2 |
| LAKE Lakeland Industries, Inc. compare | 1 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover