Alarum Technologies Ltd. Sponsored ADR
ALAR Technology Software Infrastructure
Alarum Technologies Ltd. Sponsored ADR’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $40.8 million, up 28.1% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to March 2026, revenue grew 64.2%, EPS grew 33.3% and free cash flow fell 4,208.0%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Revenue growth for five consecutive years.
Follow ALAR
Alarum Technologies Ltd. Sponsored ADR (ALAR) Piotroski F-score
Alarum Technologies Ltd. Sponsored ADR's Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 2 out of 9: 2 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 6 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 2 | (4.00) |
| FY2024 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2023 | 6 | 3.00 |
| FY2022 | 3 | (1.00) |
| FY2021 | 4 | (2.00) |
| FY2020 | 6 | 2.00 |
| FY2019 | 4 | 2.00 |
| FY2018 | 2 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 2.39% | 21.07% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (2.01m) | 8.89m | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | 2.39% | 21.07% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | (2.98m) | 3.11m | Fail | 0 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.00 | 0.00 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 2.21 | 2.30 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 7,082,700 | 6,643,800 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 58.49% | 75.13% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 1.01 | 1.16 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 2 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| CISO CISO Global, Inc. compare | 6 |
| DTSS Datasea Intelligent Technology Ltd. compare | 5 |
| BLIN Bridgeline Digital, Inc. compare | 4 |
| OLB OLB Group, Inc. compare | 4 |
| APCX AppTech Payments Corp. compare | 3 |
| HPAI Helport AI Limited compare | 3 |
| BTLN Brightline Interactive, Inc. compare | 3 |
| ALAR Alarum Technologies Ltd. Sponsored ADR | 2 |
| RKTO Rocket One Inc. compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover