Antelope Enterprise Holdings L
AEHL Industrials Building Products & Equipment
Antelope Enterprise Holdings L’s revenue for fiscal 2024 (year ended December 2024) was $98.8 million, up 37.0% from fiscal 2023. Revenue growth for five consecutive years.
Follow AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings L (AEHL) Piotroski F-score
Antelope Enterprise Holdings L's Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2024 is 1 out of 9: 1 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 3 in fiscal 2023.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | 1 | (2.00) |
| FY2023 | 3 | (2.00) |
| FY2022 | 5 | 0.00 |
| FY2021 | 5 | 3.00 |
| FY2020 | 2 | (5.00) |
| FY2019 | 7 | 5.00 |
| FY2018 | 2 | (4.00) |
| FY2017 | 6 | 1.00 |
| FY2016 | 5 | — |
How fiscal 2024’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (38.26%) | (12.10%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (15.48m) | (8.52m) | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | (38.26%) | (12.10%) | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | (4.94m) | (6.50m) | Fail | 0 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.04 | 0.06 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 2.52 | 2.88 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 3,500 | 600 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | (0.13%) | 10.39% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 3.58 | 4.31 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 1 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| JBI Janus International Group, Inc. compare | 6 |
| LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc. compare | 5 |
| PPIH Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. compare | 5 |
| ASPN Aspen Aerogels, Inc. compare | 4 |
| CSTE Caesarstone Ltd. compare | 3 |
| JELD JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. compare | 2 |
| AEHL Antelope Enterprise Holdings L | 1 |
| JLHL Julong Holding Limited compare | — |
| AIRJ AirJoule Technologies Corporation compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover