Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
RNGR Energy Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Ranger Energy Services, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $546.9 million, down 4.24% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 25.5%, EPS fell 12.1% and free cash flow grew 33.6%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for three consecutive years.
Follow RNGR
Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) Piotroski F-score
Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 5 out of 9: 5 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 7 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 5 | (2.00) |
| FY2024 | 7 | 0.00 |
| FY2023 | 7 | (1.00) |
| FY2022 | 8 | 5.00 |
| FY2021 | 3 | (2.00) |
| FY2020 | 5 | (3.00) |
| FY2019 | 8 | 2.00 |
| FY2018 | 6 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 3.07% | 4.84% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 69.00m | 84.50m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 3.07% | 4.84% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 56.70m | 66.10m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.00 | 0.00 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.75 | 2.21 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 22,358,100 | 22,518,700 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 16.51% | 17.21% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 1.37 | 1.50 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 5 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| CLB Core Laboratories Inc. compare | 7 |
| FET Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. compare | 6 |
| SND Smart Sand compare | 6 |
| NGS Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. compare | 5 |
| RNGR Ranger Energy Services, Inc. | 5 |
| OIS Oil States International, Inc. compare | 5 |
| OMSE OMS Energy Technologies Inc. compare | 5 |
| KLXE KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. compare | 3 |
| ACDC ProFrac Holding Corp. compare | 2 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover