Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
PRTH Technology Software Infrastructure
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $953.0 million, up 8.33% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 9.36%, EPS fell 14.3%, free cash flow grew 164.5% and total debt rose 13.7%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Revenue growth for five consecutive years, operating cash flow growth for three.
Follow PRTH
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) Piotroski F-score
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 7 out of 9: 7 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, unchanged from fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 7 | 0.00 |
| FY2024 | 7 | 2.00 |
| FY2023 | 5 | 0.00 |
| FY2022 | 5 | 1.00 |
| FY2021 | 4 | (1.00) |
| FY2020 | 5 | 1.00 |
| FY2019 | 4 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 2.64% | (1.39%) | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 100.01m | 85.61m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 2.64% | (1.39%) | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 44.32m | 109.57m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.49 | 0.54 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.07 | 1.05 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 79,798,000 | 77,993,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 39.32% | 37.29% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.45 | 0.51 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Strong — most fundamentals improved | 7 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| PRTH Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. | 7 |
| CGNT Cognyte Software Ltd. compare | 7 |
| CCSI Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. compare | 6 |
| YEXT Yext compare | 6 |
| SABR Sabre Corporation compare | 6 |
| OSPN ONESPAN INC compare | 6 |
| AEVA Aeva Technologies, Inc. compare | 4 |
| BLZE Backblaze, Inc. compare | 4 |
| HQ Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover