NOMADAR Corp.
NOMA Consumer Cyclical Leisure
NOMADAR Corp.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $921,900.00, up 11,423.8% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 114.2%, EPS grew 32.1% and free cash flow fell 8,978.5%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow NOMA
NOMADAR Corp. (NOMA) Altman Z-score
NOMADAR Corp.'s Altman Z-score for fiscal 2025 is 4.36, in the safe zone (above 2.99).
Altman Z-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Altman Z-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 4.36 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Component | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital / total assets | (0.28) | — | −0.33 | |
| Retained earnings / total assets | (0.30) | — | −0.42 | |
| EBIT / total assets | (0.19) | — | −0.63 | |
| Market value of equity / total liabilities | 9.45 | — | 5.67 | |
| Sales / total assets | 0.07 | — | 0.07 | |
| Altman Z-score | Safe zone | 4.36 | ||
| Z″ Variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies (drops the sales/assets term, uses book equity) | Distress zone | −2.98 | ||
Z and Z″ put NOMADAR Corp. in different zones: safe zone by Z, distress zone by Z″.
How the Altman Z-score works
Z = 1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets (Altman, 1968). The market value of equity is the close on the last trading day of the fiscal year times weighted basic shares.
Z″ = 6.56 × working capital ÷ total assets + 3.26 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 6.72 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 1.05 × book equity ÷ total liabilities (Altman, Hartzell and Peck, 1995), the variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies.
| Zone | Z | Z″ |
|---|---|---|
| Safe zone | above 2.99 | above 2.60 |
| Grey zone | 1.81–2.99 | 1.10–2.60 |
| Distress zone | below 1.81 | below 1.10 |
Not worked out for banks, insurers and REITs, whose balance sheets the model does not describe, nor when a figure is missing or there is no share price in the week to the fiscal year end.
Altman Z-score against peers
| Company | Altman Z-score |
|---|---|
| PUSA Powerus Corporation compare | 13.3× |
| KMRK K-Tech Solutions Company Limited compare | 8.7× |
| NOMA NOMADAR Corp. | 4.4× |
| KBSX FST Corp. compare | 1.5× |
| GDHG Golden Heaven Group Holdings Ltd. compare | 1.3× |
| HERE Here Group Limited compare | 1.1× |
| DOGZ Dogness (International) Corporation compare | −0.8× |
| ESYN EnerSyn Global Inc. compare | −1.1× |
| PLBY PLBY Group, Inc. compare | −2.6× |
What Altman Z-score is
The Altman Z-Score weighs working capital, retained earnings, operating profit, market value and sales against assets and debts to gauge the risk of distress.
1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets