FLUENT, INC.
FLNT Communication Services Advertising Agencies
FLUENT, INC.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $208.8 million, down 18.0% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 8.37%, EPS grew 33.3%, free cash flow fell 835.5% and total debt rose 37.7%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow FLNT
FLUENT, INC. (FLNT) Piotroski F-score
FLUENT, INC.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 3 out of 9: 3 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 4 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 3 | (1.00) |
| FY2024 | 4 | (1.00) |
| FY2023 | 5 | 2.00 |
| FY2022 | 3 | (1.00) |
| FY2021 | 4 | (4.00) |
| FY2020 | 8 | 3.00 |
| FY2019 | 5 | (2.00) |
| FY2018 | 7 | 2.00 |
| FY2017 | 5 | (1.00) |
| FY2016 | 6 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (29.73%) | (28.50%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (1.47m) | (14.10m) | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | (29.73%) | (28.50%) | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 25.70m | 15.17m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.04 | 0.04 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.04 | 1.02 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 25,970,600 | 16,259,900 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 24.54% | 23.88% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 2.28 | 2.48 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 3 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| SWAG Stran & Company, Inc. compare | 5 |
| NCMI National CineMedia, Inc. compare | 5 |
| STFS Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited compare | 4 |
| TSQ Townsquare Media, Inc. compare | 4 |
| SDM Smart Digital Group Limited compare | 4 |
| MCHX Marchex, Inc. compare | 3 |
| FLNT FLUENT, INC. | 3 |
| MF MindForge Inc. compare | 2 |
| TJGC TJGC Group Limited compare | 2 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover