Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
EBMT Financial Banks Regional
Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $127.1 million, up 4.18% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 1.03%, EPS grew 11.9%, free cash flow fell 301.0% and total debt fell 45.9%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for ten consecutive years, revenue growth for three; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow EBMT
Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT) Piotroski F-score
Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 8 out of 9: 8 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, up from 5 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 8 | 3.00 |
| FY2024 | 5 | 1.00 |
| FY2023 | 4 | 0.00 |
| FY2022 | 4 | (2.00) |
| FY2021 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2020 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2019 | 6 | 2.00 |
| FY2018 | 4 | 0.00 |
| FY2017 | 4 | (3.00) |
| FY2016 | 7 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 0.70% | 0.47% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 33.13m | 28.54m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 0.70% | 0.47% | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 18.29m | 18.76m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.04 | 0.10 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 0.87 | 0.90 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 7,802,000 | 7,839,000 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 72.05% | 66.58% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.06 | 0.06 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Strong — most fundamentals improved | 8 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| SBFG SB Financial Group, Inc. compare | 9 |
| ECBK ECB Bancorp, Inc. compare | 8 |
| EBMT Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. | 8 |
| BVFL BV Financial, Inc. compare | 6 |
| MNSB MainStreet Bank compare | 6 |
| FNWD Finward Bancorp compare | 6 |
| BAFN BayFirst Financial Corp. compare | 4 |
| FINW FinWise Bancorp compare | 4 |
| HNVR Hanover Bancorp, Inc. compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover