GrafTech International Ltd.
EAF Industrials Electrical Equipment & Parts
GrafTech International Ltd.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $504.1 million, down 6.43% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 3.40%, EPS grew 54.7%, free cash flow fell 32.2% and total debt rose 9.88%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for three consecutive years.
Follow EAF
GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF) Piotroski F-score
GrafTech International Ltd.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 3 out of 9: 3 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, unchanged from fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 3 | 0.00 |
| FY2024 | 3 | (1.00) |
| FY2023 | 4 | (1.00) |
| FY2022 | 5 | (1.00) |
| FY2021 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2020 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2019 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2018 | 6 | (2.00) |
| FY2017 | 8 | 4.00 |
| FY2016 | 4 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (19.51%) | (10.44%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (81.62m) | (40.09m) | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | (19.51%) | (10.44%) | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 138.22m | 91.07m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.97 | 0.87 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 3.78 | 4.55 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 26,005,000 | 25,766,800 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | (3.11%) | (3.68%) | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.45 | 0.43 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 3 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| OESX Orion Energy Systems, Inc. compare | 6 |
| ELVA Electrovaya Inc. compare | 6 |
| ESP Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. compare | 5 |
| ULBI Ultralife Corporation compare | 4 |
| LTBR Lightbridge Corporation compare | 4 |
| NEOV NeoVolta, Inc. compare | 4 |
| EAF GrafTech International Ltd. | 3 |
| SKYX SKYX Platforms Corp. compare | 3 |
| CBAT China BAK Battery, Inc. compare | 3 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover