Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.
CVLG Industrials Trucking
Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $1.2 billion, up 2.92% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 9.91%, EPS fell 10.5%, free cash flow fell 406.9% and total debt rose 8.09%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for five consecutive years.
Follow CVLG
Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. (CVLG) Piotroski F-score
Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 4 out of 9: 4 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 6 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 4 | (2.00) |
| FY2024 | 6 | 1.00 |
| FY2023 | 5 | (3.00) |
| FY2022 | 8 | 0.00 |
| FY2021 | 8 | 2.00 |
| FY2020 | 6 | 2.00 |
| FY2019 | 4 | (2.00) |
| FY2018 | 6 | (1.00) |
| FY2017 | 7 | 1.00 |
| FY2016 | 6 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 0.71% | 3.68% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 113.65m | 122.89m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 0.71% | 3.68% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 106.41m | 86.97m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.23 | 0.19 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.11 | 1.18 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 25,648,000 | 26,307,000 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 65.74% | 67.27% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 1.14 | 1.16 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 4 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| SNDR Schneider National, Inc. compare | 8 |
| MRTN Marten Transport, Ltd. compare | 6 |
| HTLD Heartland Express, Inc. compare | 5 |
| RXO RXO INC compare | 5 |
| WERN Werner Enterprises, Inc. compare | 5 |
| CVLG Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. | 4 |
| ARCB ArcBest Corporation compare | 4 |
| ULH Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. compare | 3 |
| PAMT PAMT Corp. compare | 3 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover