Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
APOG Industrials Building Products & Equipment
Apogee Enterprises, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2026 (year ended February 2026) was $1.4 billion, up 3.21% from fiscal 2025. In the quarter to August 2026, revenue grew 9.20%, EPS fell 1.82%, free cash flow fell 53.6% and total debt rose 24.3%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for twenty-five consecutive years.
Follow APOG
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) Piotroski F-score
Apogee Enterprises, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2026 is 6 out of 9: 6 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, unchanged from fiscal 2025.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2025 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2024 | 6 | (1.00) |
| FY2023 | 7 | 2.00 |
| FY2022 | 5 | (1.00) |
| FY2021 | 6 | (1.00) |
| FY2020 | 7 | 1.00 |
| FY2019 | 6 | 1.00 |
| FY2018 | 5 | (1.00) |
| FY2017 | 6 | — |
How fiscal 2026’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 4.71% | 8.26% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 122.47m | 125.16m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 4.71% | 8.26% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 68.33m | 40.11m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.20 | 0.28 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.65 | 1.55 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 21,295,000 | 21,726,000 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 22.74% | 26.44% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 1.22 | 1.32 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 6 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| NPKI NPK International Inc. compare | 7 |
| SWIM Latham Group, Inc. compare | 7 |
| ARLO Arlo Technologies, Inc. compare | 7 |
| JBI Janus International Group, Inc. compare | 6 |
| APOG Apogee Enterprises, Inc. | 6 |
| LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc. compare | 5 |
| NX Quanex Building Products Corporation compare | 5 |
| ROCK Gibraltar Industries, Inc. compare | 5 |
| ASPN Aspen Aerogels, Inc. compare | 4 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover