Americas Gold and Silver Corporation
USAS Basic Materials Other Industrial Metals & Mining
Americas Gold and Silver Corporation’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $117.9 million, up 17.7% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 72.1%, EPS grew 69.8%, free cash flow fell 209.6% and total debt fell 8.98%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Revenue growth for five consecutive years.
Follow USAS
Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) Piotroski F-score
Americas Gold and Silver Corporation's Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 3 out of 9: 3 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 4 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 3 | (1.00) |
| FY2024 | 4 | (1.00) |
| FY2023 | 5 | 0.00 |
| FY2022 | 5 | 1.00 |
| FY2021 | 4 | 2.00 |
| FY2020 | 2 | 0.00 |
| FY2019 | 2 | (2.00) |
| FY2018 | 4 | 0.00 |
| FY2017 | 4 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (28.88%) | (24.16%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (3.94m) | (3.07m) | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | (28.88%) | (24.16%) | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 83.50m | 42.00m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.15 | 0.04 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.78 | 0.59 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 267,337,000 | 105,967,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 28.04% | 17.42% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.39 | 0.54 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 3 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| NEXA Nexa Resources S.A. compare | 8 |
| SGML Sigma Lithium Corporation compare | 3 |
| USAS Americas Gold and Silver Corporation | 3 |
| VZLA Vizsla Silver Corp. compare | — |
| CRML Critical Metals Corp. compare | — |
| TMC TMC the metals company Inc. compare | — |
| EMAT Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp. compare | — |
| CMP Compass Minerals International, Inc. compare | — |
| LAC Lithium Americas Corp. compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover