TriNet Group, Inc.
TNET Industrials Staffing & Employment Services
TriNet Group, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $4.9 billion, down 0.92% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 4.43%, EPS grew 50.7%, free cash flow grew 17.5% and total debt fell 8.94%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for three consecutive years; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow TNET
TriNet Group, Inc. (TNET) Piotroski F-score
TriNet Group, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 6 out of 9: 6 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, unchanged from fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2024 | 6 | 2.00 |
| FY2023 | 4 | (3.00) |
| FY2022 | 7 | 0.00 |
| FY2021 | 7 | (1.00) |
| FY2020 | 8 | 1.00 |
| FY2019 | 7 | 2.00 |
| FY2018 | 5 | (3.00) |
| FY2017 | 8 | (1.00) |
| FY2016 | 9 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 3.92% | 4.43% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 303.00m | 279.00m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 3.92% | 4.43% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 148.00m | 106.00m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.23 | 0.23 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.09 | 1.07 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 48,000,000 | 50,000,000 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 16.57% | 17.80% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 1.25 | 1.28 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 6 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| KFY Korn/Ferry International compare | 8 |
| HHR HeadHunter Group PLC Sponsored ADR compare | 6 |
| BBSI Barrett Business Services, Inc. compare | 6 |
| TNET TriNet Group, Inc. | 6 |
| KELYB Kelly Services, Inc. compare | 5 |
| RHI Robert Half Inc. compare | 5 |
| KFRC Kforce, Inc. compare | 4 |
| NSP Insperity, Inc. compare | 3 |
| MAN ManpowerGroup Inc. compare | 1 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover