Teads Holding Co.
TEAD Communication Services Internet Content & Information
Teads Holding Co.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $1.3 billion, up 46.1% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 17.1%, EPS fell 193.3%, free cash flow fell 83.5% and total debt was flat, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for five consecutive years; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow TEAD
Teads Holding Co. (TEAD) Beneish M-score
Teads Holding Co.'s Beneish M-score for fiscal 2025 is −3.56; values above −1.78 are the model's flag for possible earnings manipulation — a statistical screen, not a finding.
Beneish M-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Beneish M-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −3.56 | (0.23) |
| FY2024 | −3.33 | (0.97) |
| FY2023 | −2.36 | (0.44) |
| FY2022 | −1.92 | 0.76 |
| FY2021 | −2.68 | 0.39 |
| FY2020 | −3.08 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Component | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days’ sales in receivables index | 1.57 | — | 1.44 | |
| Gross margin index | 0.65 | — | 0.35 | |
| Asset quality index | 1.92 | — | 0.78 | |
| Sales growth index | 1.46 | — | 1.30 | |
| Depreciation index | 0.45 | — | 0.05 | |
| SG&A index | 1.65 | — | −0.28 | |
| Total accruals to total assets | (0.40) | — | −1.85 | |
| Leverage index | 1.56 | — | −0.51 | |
| Beneish M-score | Low — no pattern the model associates with manipulation | −3.56 | ||
How the Beneish M-score works
M = −4.84 + 0.920 × DSRI + 0.528 × GMI + 0.404 × AQI + 0.892 × SGI + 0.115 × DEPI − 0.172 × SGAI + 4.679 × TATA − 0.327 × LVGI (Beneish, 1999): eight changes in the accounts from one fiscal year to the next, which the model weighs for the pattern seen in companies that later restated their earnings. Higher is worse.
| below −2.22 | Low — no pattern the model associates with manipulation |
|---|---|
| −2.22 to −1.78 | Elevated |
| above −1.78 | Flagged by the model |
−1.78 is the cut-off usually quoted from the paper, −2.22 a common conservative one. A statistical screen, not a finding of wrongdoing.
When asset quality, depreciation or SG&A cannot be worked out, that index is set to 1, as Beneish did, and the breakdown says so; with all three missing there is no score. Depreciation includes amortisation, and asset quality leaves out securities. Not worked out for banks, insurers and REITs.
Beneish M-score against peers
| Company | Beneish M-score |
|---|---|
| SJ Scienjoy Holding Corporation compare | −7.9× |
| SEAT Vivid Seats Inc. compare | −7.9× |
| TEAD Teads Holding Co. | −3.6× |
| ZDGE Zedge, Inc. compare | −3.4× |
| IZEA IZEA WORLDWIDE, INC. compare | −3.1× |
| LVO LiveOne, Inc. compare | −3.0× |
| PAAI Paradigm AI, Inc. compare | −3.0× |
| GETY Getty Images Holdings, Inc. compare | −2.8× |
| BODI The Beachbody Company, Inc. compare | — |
What Beneish M-score is
The Beneish M-Score combines eight year-on-year changes in the accounts into a statistical screen for patterns seen in companies that overstated earnings.
−4.84 + 0.920 × DSRI + 0.528 × GMI + 0.404 × AQI + 0.892 × SGI + 0.115 × DEPI − 0.172 × SGAI + 4.679 × TATA − 0.327 × LVGI