Singularity Future Technology Ltd.
SGLY Industrials Integrated Freight & Logistics
Singularity Future Technology Ltd.’s revenue for fiscal 2026 (year ended June 2026) was $1.7 million, down 6.61% from fiscal 2025. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 75.9%, EPS grew 369.7% and free cash flow grew 79.8%, each against the same quarter a year earlier.
Follow SGLY
Singularity Future Technology Ltd. (SGLY) Piotroski F-score
Singularity Future Technology Ltd.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2026 is 2 out of 9: 2 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 4 in fiscal 2025.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | 2 | (2.00) |
| FY2025 | 4 | (1.00) |
| FY2024 | 5 | 2.00 |
| FY2023 | 3 | 1.00 |
| FY2022 | 2 | (2.00) |
| FY2021 | 4 | 2.00 |
| FY2020 | 2 | (1.00) |
| FY2019 | 3 | 0.00 |
| FY2018 | 3 | (4.00) |
| FY2017 | 7 | — |
How fiscal 2026’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (28.92%) | (21.17%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (21.63m) | (2.69m) | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | (28.92%) | (21.17%) | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | (15.75m) | 1.22m | Fail | 0 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.00 | 0.00 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.88 | 2.49 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 453,800 | 264,800 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 3.18% | 2.83% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.08 | 0.10 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 2 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| CTNT Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc. compare | 5 |
| GVH Globavend Holdings Limited compare | 4 |
| JYD Jayud Global Logistics Limited compare | 3 |
| BTOC Armlogi Holding Corp. compare | 3 |
| ATXG Addentax Group Corp. compare | 3 |
| HXHX Haoxin Holdings Limited compare | 2 |
| CIIT TIANCI INTERNATIONAL, INC. compare | 2 |
| SGLY Singularity Future Technology Ltd. | 2 |
| SLGB Smart Logistics Global Limited compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover