374Water Inc.
SCWO Industrials Pollution & Treatment Controls
374Water Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $215,000.00, down 51.7% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 280.2%, EPS grew 50.0%, free cash flow grew 85.3% and total debt rose 7,480.3%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow SCWO
374Water Inc. (SCWO) Piotroski F-score
374Water Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 1 out of 9: 1 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 2 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 1 | (1.00) |
| FY2024 | 2 | 0.00 |
| FY2023 | 2 | (1.00) |
| FY2022 | 3 | (1.00) |
| FY2021 | 4 | (3.00) |
| FY2020 | 7 | 5.00 |
| FY2019 | 2 | (2.00) |
| FY2018 | 4 | (3.00) |
| FY2017 | 7 | 0.00 |
| FY2016 | 7 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (137.14%) | (70.44%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (14.33m) | (10.59m) | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | (137.14%) | (70.44%) | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 6.65m | 1.84m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.00 | 0.00 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.40 | 4.76 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 15,231,000 | 13,449,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | (1,093.67%) | (204.92%) | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.01 | 0.03 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 1 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| FTEK Fuel Tech, Inc. compare | 6 |
| BCHT Birchtech Corp. compare | 5 |
| LIQT LiqTech International, Inc. compare | 4 |
| CLIR ClearSign Technologies Corporation compare | 4 |
| ARQ Arq, Inc. compare | 3 |
| ZONE Zone Frontier Inc. compare | 3 |
| TOMZ TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. compare | 3 |
| CLWT Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited compare | 3 |
| SCWO 374Water Inc. | 1 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover