Pitney Bowes Inc.
PBI Industrials Integrated Freight & Logistics
Pitney Bowes Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $1.9 billion, down 6.61% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 2.25%, EPS grew 117.7%, free cash flow grew 37.1% and total debt rose 7.23%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for five consecutive years; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow PBI
Pitney Bowes Inc. (PBI) Altman Z-score
Pitney Bowes Inc.'s Altman Z-score for fiscal 2025 is 2.22, in the grey zone (1.81–2.99).
Altman Z-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Altman Z-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 2.22 | 0.22 |
| FY2024 | 2.00 | 0.32 |
| FY2023 | 1.67 | (0.65) |
| FY2022 | 2.32 | (0.15) |
| FY2021 | 2.47 | 0.26 |
| FY2020 | 2.21 | (0.09) |
| FY2019 | 2.30 | 0.05 |
| FY2018 | 2.25 | 0.23 |
| FY2017 | 2.02 | (0.20) |
| FY2016 | 2.23 | (0.30) |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Component | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital / total assets | (0.14) | — | −0.17 | |
| Retained earnings / total assets | 0.84 | — | 1.17 | |
| EBIT / total assets | 0.10 | — | 0.34 | |
| Market value of equity / total liabilities | 0.46 | — | 0.27 | |
| Sales / total assets | 0.60 | — | 0.60 | |
| Altman Z-score | Grey zone | 2.22 | ||
| Z″ Variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies (drops the sales/assets term, uses book equity) | Grey zone | 2.29 | ||
How the Altman Z-score works
Z = 1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets (Altman, 1968). The market value of equity is the close on the last trading day of the fiscal year times weighted basic shares.
Z″ = 6.56 × working capital ÷ total assets + 3.26 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 6.72 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 1.05 × book equity ÷ total liabilities (Altman, Hartzell and Peck, 1995), the variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies.
| Zone | Z | Z″ |
|---|---|---|
| Safe zone | above 2.99 | above 2.60 |
| Grey zone | 1.81–2.99 | 1.10–2.60 |
| Distress zone | below 1.81 | below 1.10 |
Not worked out for banks, insurers and REITs, whose balance sheets the model does not describe, nor when a figure is missing or there is no share price in the week to the fiscal year end.
Altman Z-score against peers
| Company | Altman Z-score |
|---|---|
| LSTR Landstar System, Inc. compare | 9.6× |
| JBHT J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. compare | 5.8× |
| ZTO ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. compare | 4.7× |
| RLGT Radiant Logistics, Inc. compare | 4.3× |
| HUBG Hub Group, Inc. compare | 4.0× |
| PBI Pitney Bowes Inc. | 2.2× |
| GXO GXO Logistics, Inc. compare | 1.6× |
| FWRD Forward Air Corporation compare | 1.0× |
| CYRX CryoPort, Inc. compare | 0.3× |
What Altman Z-score is
The Altman Z-Score weighs working capital, retained earnings, operating profit, market value and sales against assets and debts to gauge the risk of distress.
1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets