Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp.
NCDL Financial Asset Management
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $207.9 million, down 7.22% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 16.6%, EPS fell 78.1%, free cash flow fell 55.5% and total debt was flat, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Operating cash flow growth for three consecutive years; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow NCDL
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp. (NCDL) Piotroski F-score
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 6 out of 9: 6 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, up from 4 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 6 | 2.00 |
| FY2024 | 4 | (1.00) |
| FY2023 | 5 | 1.00 |
| FY2022 | 4 | 0.00 |
| FY2021 | 4 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 3.13% | 6.00% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 194.16m | (297.20m) | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 3.13% | 6.00% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 128.54m | (413.52m) | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.53 | 0.57 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.85 | 0.96 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 50,286,300 | 54,118,400 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 100.00% | 100.00% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.10 | 0.12 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 6 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| NOAH Noah Holdings Ltd. compare | 7 |
| NMFC New Mountain Finance Corporation compare | 6 |
| NCDL Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp. | 6 |
| GLAD Gladstone Capital Corporation compare | 3 |
| OIO ESGL Holdings Limited compare | 3 |
| GAIN Gladstone Investment Corporation compare | 3 |
| SLRC SLR Investment Corp. compare | 2 |
| PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. compare | 1 |
| ACGP Associated Capital Group, Inc. compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover