Natural Alternatives International, Inc.
NAII Consumer Defensive Packaged Foods
Natural Alternatives International, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2026 (year ended June 2026) was $142.5 million, up 9.75% from fiscal 2025. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 1.90%, EPS fell 87.0%, free cash flow fell 190.1% and total debt rose 70.5%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow NAII
Natural Alternatives International, Inc. (NAII) Piotroski F-score
Natural Alternatives International, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2026 is 2 out of 9: 2 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 5 in fiscal 2025.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | 2 | (3.00) |
| FY2025 | 5 | 3.00 |
| FY2024 | 2 | (4.00) |
| FY2023 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2022 | 6 | (3.00) |
| FY2021 | 9 | 6.00 |
| FY2020 | 3 | (3.00) |
| FY2019 | 6 | 2.00 |
| FY2018 | 4 | (1.00) |
| FY2017 | 5 | — |
How fiscal 2026’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (14.87%) | (8.64%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (8.92m) | 5.93m | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | (14.87%) | (8.64%) | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 11.78m | 19.51m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.07 | 0.05 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.73 | 2.06 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 6,028,000 | 5,947,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 6.31% | 7.15% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 1.02 | 0.83 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 2 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| PAVS Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. compare | 6 |
| NCRA Nocera, Inc. compare | 4 |
| FAMI Farmmi, Inc. compare | 3 |
| SNAX Stryve Foods, Inc. compare | 3 |
| NAII Natural Alternatives International, Inc. | 2 |
| CIMG CIMG Inc. compare | 2 |
| DDC DDC Enterprise Limited compare | 2 |
| UCFI CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp compare | — |
| ABVEF Above Food Ingredients Inc. compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover