McEwen Inc.
MUX Basic Materials Other Precious Metals & Mining
McEwen Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $197.6 million, up 13.2% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 26.8%, EPS grew 166.7%, free cash flow grew 328.1% and total debt was flat, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for three consecutive years, revenue growth for three; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow MUX
McEwen Inc. (MUX) Altman Z-score
McEwen Inc.'s Altman Z-score for fiscal 2025 is 0.33, in the distress zone (below 1.81).
Altman Z-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Altman Z-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 0.33 | 1.69 |
| FY2024 | −1.36 | 0.53 |
| FY2023 | −1.89 | 1.04 |
| FY2022 | −2.92 | (1.34) |
| FY2021 | −1.59 | 0.75 |
| FY2020 | −2.34 | (2.03) |
| FY2019 | −0.31 | (0.85) |
| FY2018 | 0.54 | (3.38) |
| FY2017 | 3.93 | (3.37) |
| FY2016 | 7.30 | 6.80 |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Component | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital / total assets | 0.05 | — | 0.06 | |
| Retained earnings / total assets | (1.55) | — | −2.18 | |
| EBIT / total assets | 0.00 | — | 0.01 | |
| Market value of equity / total liabilities | 3.65 | — | 2.19 | |
| Sales / total assets | 0.24 | — | 0.24 | |
| Altman Z-score | Distress zone | 0.33 | ||
| Z″ Variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies (drops the sales/assets term, uses book equity) | Distress zone | −2.60 | ||
How the Altman Z-score works
Z = 1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets (Altman, 1968). The market value of equity is the close on the last trading day of the fiscal year times weighted basic shares.
Z″ = 6.56 × working capital ÷ total assets + 3.26 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 6.72 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 1.05 × book equity ÷ total liabilities (Altman, Hartzell and Peck, 1995), the variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies.
| Zone | Z | Z″ |
|---|---|---|
| Safe zone | above 2.99 | above 2.60 |
| Grey zone | 1.81–2.99 | 1.10–2.60 |
| Distress zone | below 1.81 | below 1.10 |
Not worked out for banks, insurers and REITs, whose balance sheets the model does not describe, nor when a figure is missing or there is no share price in the week to the fiscal year end.
Altman Z-score against peers
| Company | Altman Z-score |
|---|---|
| TFPM Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. compare | 60.2× |
| MTA Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. compare | 22.3× |
| ASM Avino Silver compare | 13.3× |
| VOXR Vox Royalty Corp. compare | 9.6× |
| ITRG Integra Resources Corp. compare | 4.4× |
| GORO Gold Resource Corporation compare | 3.1× |
| MUX McEwen Inc. | 0.3× |
| PPTA Perpetua Resources Corp. compare | — |
| SLSR Solaris Resources Inc. compare | — |
What Altman Z-score is
The Altman Z-Score weighs working capital, retained earnings, operating profit, market value and sales against assets and debts to gauge the risk of distress.
1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets