McEwen Inc.
MUX Basic Materials Other Precious Metals & Mining
McEwen Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $197.6 million, up 13.2% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 26.8%, EPS grew 166.7%, free cash flow grew 328.1% and total debt was flat, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for three consecutive years, revenue growth for three; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow MUX
McEwen Inc. (MUX) Piotroski F-score
McEwen Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 6 out of 9: 6 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, up from 4 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 6 | 2.00 |
| FY2024 | 4 | (2.00) |
| FY2023 | 6 | 4.00 |
| FY2022 | 2 | (3.00) |
| FY2021 | 5 | 4.00 |
| FY2020 | 1 | (2.00) |
| FY2019 | 3 | 0.00 |
| FY2018 | 3 | 3.00 |
| FY2017 | 0 | (7.00) |
| FY2016 | 7 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 4.64% | (6.61%) | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 6.87m | 29.45m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 4.64% | (6.61%) | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | (27.57m) | 73.15m | Fail | 0 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.17 | 0.06 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.69 | 0.86 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 54,046,000 | 51,021,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 24.08% | 17.73% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.27 | 0.26 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 6 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| TFPM Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. compare | 9 |
| GORO Gold Resource Corporation compare | 7 |
| ASM Avino Silver compare | 6 |
| MUX McEwen Inc. | 6 |
| MTA Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. compare | 6 |
| VOXR Vox Royalty Corp. compare | 4 |
| PPTA Perpetua Resources Corp. compare | — |
| ITRG Integra Resources Corp. compare | — |
| SLSR Solaris Resources Inc. compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover