La Rosa Holdings Corp.
LRHC Real Estate Real Estate Services
La Rosa Holdings Corp.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $68.5 million, up 16.7% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 25.6%, EPS fell 100.0%, free cash flow fell 120.9% and total debt rose 84.3%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Revenue growth for three consecutive years; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow LRHC
La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC) Piotroski F-score
La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 4 out of 9: 4 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, up from 3 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 4 | 1.00 |
| FY2024 | 3 | 0.00 |
| FY2023 | 3 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (199.81%) | (94.40%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (7.53m) | (3.00m) | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | (199.81%) | (94.40%) | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 25.29m | 12.93m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.43 | 0.09 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.93 | 0.71 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 1,500 | 300 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 10.17% | 10.15% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 4.17 | 3.48 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 4 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| CHGA Change Agents Corporation compare | 6 |
| GBR New Concept Energy, Inc compare | 5 |
| AIRE reAlpha Tech Corp. compare | 5 |
| OMH Ohmyhome Limited compare | 5 |
| UK Ucommune International Ltd. compare | 4 |
| LRHC La Rosa Holdings Corp. | 4 |
| OPAD Offerpad Solutions Inc. compare | 3 |
| FTHM Fathom Holdings Inc. compare | 3 |
| GYRO Gyrodyne , LLC compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover