LiqTech International, Inc.
LIQT Industrials Pollution & Treatment Controls
LiqTech International, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $16.5 million, up 13.0% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 12.0%, EPS grew 3.45%, free cash flow fell 99.2% and total debt fell 71.8%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow LIQT
LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT) Piotroski F-score
LiqTech International, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 4 out of 9: 4 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, up from 2 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 4 | 2.00 |
| FY2024 | 2 | (2.00) |
| FY2023 | 4 | 1.00 |
| FY2022 | 3 | 2.00 |
| FY2021 | 1 | 0.00 |
| FY2020 | 1 | (4.00) |
| FY2019 | 5 | 0.00 |
| FY2018 | 5 | 0.00 |
| FY2017 | 5 | 2.00 |
| FY2016 | 3 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (28.81%) | (30.25%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (6.11m) | (7.53m) | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | (28.81%) | (30.25%) | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 2.49m | 2.81m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.27 | 0.20 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 3.38 | 4.21 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 9,614,000 | 6,310,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 7.58% | 1.72% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.55 | 0.43 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 4 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| FTEK Fuel Tech, Inc. compare | 6 |
| BCHT Birchtech Corp. compare | 5 |
| CLIR ClearSign Technologies Corporation compare | 4 |
| LIQT LiqTech International, Inc. | 4 |
| CLWT Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited compare | 3 |
| TOMZ TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. compare | 3 |
| SCWO 374Water Inc. compare | 1 |
| DEVSF DevvStream Corp. compare | — |
| RAIN Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco, Inc. compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover