Aurora Mobile Limited Sponsored ADR
JG Technology Software Application
Aurora Mobile Limited Sponsored ADR’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $53.6 million, up 23.7% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 18.9%, EPS was flat and free cash flow fell 140.5%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Operating cash flow growth for three consecutive years.
Follow JG
Aurora Mobile Limited Sponsored ADR (JG) Piotroski F-score
Aurora Mobile Limited Sponsored ADR's Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 8 out of 9: 8 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, up from 6 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 8 | 2.00 |
| FY2024 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2023 | 6 | 2.00 |
| FY2022 | 4 | 0.00 |
| FY2021 | 4 | 0.00 |
| FY2020 | 4 | 0.00 |
| FY2019 | 4 | 0.00 |
| FY2018 | 4 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 0.11% | (1.91%) | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 9.28m | 1.17m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 0.11% | (1.91%) | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 9.22m | 2.14m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.00 | 0.00 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 0.77 | 0.71 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 80,358,000 | 5,985,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 67.20% | 66.11% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.96 | 0.86 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Strong — most fundamentals improved | 8 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| JG Aurora Mobile Limited Sponsored ADR | 8 |
| IDN Intellicheck Mobilisa, Inc. compare | 7 |
| ATHR Aether Holdings, Inc. compare | 4 |
| VTSI VirTra, Inc. compare | 3 |
| PHUN Phunware compare | 3 |
| CREX Creative Realities, Inc. compare | 2 |
| BMR Beamr Imaging Ltd. compare | 2 |
| BZAI Blaize Holdings, Inc. compare | — |
| FRMM Forum Markets, Incorporated compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover