Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc.
GWAV Industrials Waste Management
Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $46.7 million, up 40.1% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 45.5%, EPS grew 56.5%, free cash flow fell 156.1% and total debt fell 12.9%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow GWAV
Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc. (GWAV) Piotroski F-score
Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 3 out of 9: 3 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, unchanged from fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 3 | 0.00 |
| FY2024 | 3 | (1.00) |
| FY2023 | 4 | 0.00 |
| FY2022 | 4 | (2.00) |
| FY2021 | 6 | 2.00 |
| FY2020 | 4 | 1.00 |
| FY2019 | 3 | 0.00 |
| FY2018 | 3 | 0.00 |
| FY2017 | 3 | (1.00) |
| FY2016 | 4 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (41.60%) | (183.46%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (5.98m) | (17.25m) | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | (41.60%) | (183.46%) | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 18.62m | 83.19m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.10 | 0.08 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 0.21 | 0.36 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 596,400 | 107,800 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 25.45% | 38.99% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.79 | 0.61 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 3 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| AWX Avalon Holdings Corporation compare | 6 |
| AQMS Aqua Metals, Inc. compare | 4 |
| AMBIQ Ambipar Emergency Response compare | 3 |
| GWAV Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc. | 3 |
| LICYQ Li-Cycle Holdings Corp. compare | 3 |
| QRHC Quest Resource Holding Corporation. compare | 3 |
| LNZA LanzaTech Global, Inc. compare | 3 |
| CDTG CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited compare | 2 |
| DXST Decent Holding Inc. compare | 2 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover