Greenpro Capital Corp.
GRNQ Industrials Consulting Services
Greenpro Capital Corp.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $2.1 million, down 40.7% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 29.2%, EPS grew 42.9%, free cash flow grew 36.4% and total debt fell 48.9%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow GRNQ
Greenpro Capital Corp. (GRNQ) Altman Z-score
Greenpro Capital Corp.'s Altman Z-score for fiscal 2025 is −5.91, in the distress zone (below 1.81).
Altman Z-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Altman Z-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −5.91 | (2.13) |
| FY2024 | −3.78 | (0.23) |
| FY2023 | −3.55 | (1.93) |
| FY2022 | −1.62 | (6.58) |
| FY2021 | 4.97 | (3.68) |
| FY2020 | 8.65 | 7.71 |
| FY2019 | 0.94 | (24.92) |
| FY2018 | 25.86 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Component | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital / total assets | 0.18 | — | 0.22 | |
| Retained earnings / total assets | (7.90) | — | −11.07 | |
| EBIT / total assets | (0.42) | — | −1.40 | |
| Market value of equity / total liabilities | 9.88 | — | 5.93 | |
| Sales / total assets | 0.41 | — | 0.41 | |
| Altman Z-score | Distress zone | −5.91 | ||
| Z″ Variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies (drops the sales/assets term, uses book equity) | Distress zone | −24.89 | ||
How the Altman Z-score works
Z = 1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets (Altman, 1968). The market value of equity is the close on the last trading day of the fiscal year times weighted basic shares.
Z″ = 6.56 × working capital ÷ total assets + 3.26 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 6.72 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 1.05 × book equity ÷ total liabilities (Altman, Hartzell and Peck, 1995), the variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies.
| Zone | Z | Z″ |
|---|---|---|
| Safe zone | above 2.99 | above 2.60 |
| Grey zone | 1.81–2.99 | 1.10–2.60 |
| Distress zone | below 1.81 | below 1.10 |
Not worked out for banks, insurers and REITs, whose balance sheets the model does not describe, nor when a figure is missing or there is no share price in the week to the fiscal year end.
Altman Z-score against peers
| Company | Altman Z-score |
|---|---|
| FOFO Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. compare | 114× |
| EFTY Etoiles Capital Group Co., Ltd. compare | 59.3× |
| INTJ Intelligent Group Limited compare | 10.5× |
| RYOJ rYojbaba Co., Ltd. compare | 2.7× |
| RGP Resources Connection, Inc. compare | 1.8× |
| AERT Aeries Technology, Inc. compare | 1.1× |
| DGNX Diginex Limited compare | −3.2× |
| GRNQ Greenpro Capital Corp. | −5.9× |
| ACCL Acco Group Holdings Limited compare | — |
What Altman Z-score is
The Altman Z-Score weighs working capital, retained earnings, operating profit, market value and sales against assets and debts to gauge the risk of distress.
1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets