stockrowHyperscale Data, Inc.
GPUS Industrials Conglomerates
Hyperscale Data, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $102.1 million, down 4.27% from fiscal 2024.
- Revenue
- +34.8%
- EPS
- +98.1%
- Free cash flow
- −696.2%
- Total debt
- +74.1%
Quarter to June 2026, against a year earlier
Follow GPUS
Alert me
Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS) Altman Z-score
Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s Altman Z-score for fiscal 2025 is −3.71, in the distress zone (below 1.81).
Altman Z-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Altman Z-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −3.71 | 1.49 |
| FY2024 | −5.20 | (1.04) |
| FY2023 | −4.16 | (2.70) |
| FY2022 | −1.46 | (31.77) |
| FY2021 | 30.32 | 31.69 |
| FY2020 | −1.38 | 3.43 |
| FY2019 | −4.80 | (99,552.33) |
| FY2018 | 99547.52 | (73,493,306.70) |
| FY2017 | 73592854.22 | (938,480,634.48) |
| FY2016 | 1012073488.70 | 44,222,148.39 |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Component | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital / total assets | (0.13) | — | −0.16 | |
| Retained earnings / total assets | (2.34) | — | −3.28 | |
| EBIT / total assets | (0.20) | — | −0.66 | |
| Market value of equity / total liabilities | 0.09 | — | 0.05 | |
| Sales / total assets | 0.33 | — | 0.33 | |
| Altman Z-score | Distress zone | −3.71 | ||
| Z″ Variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies (drops the sales/assets term, uses book equity) | Distress zone | −9.11 | ||
How the Altman Z-score works
Z = 1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets (Altman, 1968). The market value of equity is the close on the last trading day of the fiscal year times weighted basic shares.
Z″ = 6.56 × working capital ÷ total assets + 3.26 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 6.72 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 1.05 × book equity ÷ total liabilities (Altman, Hartzell and Peck, 1995), the variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies.
| Zone | Z | Z″ |
|---|---|---|
| Safe zone | above 2.99 | above 2.60 |
| Grey zone | 1.81–2.99 | 1.10–2.60 |
| Distress zone | below 1.81 | below 1.10 |
Not worked out for banks, insurers and REITs, whose balance sheets the model does not describe, nor when a figure is missing or there is no share price in the week to the fiscal year end.
Altman Z-score against peers
| Company | Altman Z-score |
|---|---|
| HHS Harte Hanks, Inc. compare | 14.6× |
| LGPS LogProstyle Inc. compare | 1.7× |
| BOOM DMC Global compare | 1.5× |
| AIRT Air T, Inc. compare | 1.3× |
| TUSK Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. compare | −0.5× |
| GPUS Hyperscale Data, Inc. | −3.7× |
| PLAG PLANET GREEN HOLDINGS CORP. compare | −29.4× |
| SAEN Genenta Science S.p.A. Unsponsored ADR compare | — |
| AIAI AIAI Holdings Corporation compare | — |
What Altman Z-score is
The Altman Z-Score weighs working capital, retained earnings, operating profit, market value and sales against assets and debts to gauge the risk of distress.
1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets