ProFrac Holding Corp.
ACDC Energy Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
ProFrac Holding Corp.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $1.9 billion, down 11.4% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue was flat, EPS grew 32.8%, free cash flow fell 114.5% and total debt was flat, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow ACDC
ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC) Piotroski F-score
ProFrac Holding Corp.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 2 out of 9: 2 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 3 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 2 | (1.00) |
| FY2024 | 3 | 0.00 |
| FY2023 | 3 | (5.00) |
| FY2022 | 8 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (13.27%) | (7.10%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 189.50m | 367.30m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | (13.27%) | (7.10%) | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 558.50m | 582.40m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.31 | 0.31 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 0.81 | 0.87 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 168,300,000 | 159,900,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 25.09% | 31.76% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.70 | 0.72 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 2 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| CLB Core Laboratories Inc. compare | 7 |
| FET Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. compare | 6 |
| VTOL Bristow Group Inc. compare | 6 |
| FTK Flotek Industries, Inc. compare | 5 |
| PUMP ProPetro Holding Corp. compare | 5 |
| OIS Oil States International, Inc. compare | 5 |
| AESI Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. compare | 4 |
| RES RPC, Inc. compare | 4 |
| ACDC ProFrac Holding Corp. | 2 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover