Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.
WVVI Consumer Defensive Beverages Wineries & Distilleries
Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $37.2 million, down 6.50% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 1.56%, EPS fell 344.4%, free cash flow grew 54.7% and total debt fell 10.0%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow WVVI
Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. (WVVI) Piotroski F-score
Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 1 out of 9: 1 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 4 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 1 | (3.00) |
| FY2024 | 4 | 0.00 |
| FY2023 | 4 | 3.00 |
| FY2022 | 1 | (5.00) |
| FY2021 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2020 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2019 | 6 | (1.00) |
| FY2018 | 7 | 3.00 |
| FY2017 | 4 | (2.00) |
| FY2016 | 6 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (2.93%) | (2.21%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (1.79m) | (3.24m) | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | (2.93%) | (2.21%) | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 1.38m | (866.90k) | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.13 | 0.12 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 2.70 | 2.84 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 4,970,100 | 4,964,500 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 60.47% | 60.82% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.34 | 0.37 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 1 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| BF.A Brown Forman Corporation compare | 7 |
| SNDL SNDL Inc. compare | 6 |
| YHC LQR House Inc. compare | 4 |
| MGPI MGP Ingredients, Inc. compare | 4 |
| EPSM Epsium Enterprise Limited compare | 3 |
| EDVA Splash Beverage Group, Inc. compare | 3 |
| IBG Innovation Beverage Group Limited compare | 2 |
| AGCC Agencia Comercial Spirits Ltd compare | 2 |
| WVVI Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. | 1 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover