United States Antimony Corporation
UAMY Basic Materials Other Industrial Metals & Mining
United States Antimony Corporation’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $39.3 million, up 162.8% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 24.7%, EPS fell 46.7%, free cash flow fell 163.9% and total debt rose 27.7%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow UAMY
United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) Piotroski F-score
United States Antimony Corporation's Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 4 out of 9: 4 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 5 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 4 | (1.00) |
| FY2024 | 5 | 2.00 |
| FY2023 | 3 | (1.00) |
| FY2022 | 4 | 0.00 |
| FY2021 | 4 | 1.00 |
| FY2020 | 3 | 0.00 |
| FY2019 | 3 | (1.00) |
| FY2018 | 4 | 0.00 |
| FY2017 | 4 | 0.00 |
| FY2016 | 4 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (4.61%) | (5.54%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (9.69m) | 2.22m | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | (4.61%) | (5.54%) | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | (5.34m) | 3.96m | Fail | 0 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.00 | 0.01 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 5.38 | 5.16 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 123,635,000 | 108,591,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 25.15% | 23.21% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.42 | 0.48 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 4 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| UAMY United States Antimony Corporation | 4 |
| ALOY REalloys Inc. compare | 4 |
| WRN Western Copper and Gold Corporation compare | — |
| TMQ Trilogy Metals Inc. compare | — |
| SLI Standard Lithium Ltd. compare | — |
| IPX IperionX Limited Sponsored ADR compare | — |
| ELVR Elevra Lithium Limited - Sponsored ADR compare | — |
| NMG Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. compare | — |
| NB NioCorp Developments Ltd. compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover