Summit Midstream Partners, LP
SMC Energy Oil & Gas Midstream
Summit Midstream Partners, LP’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $562.1 million, up 30.8% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 10.6%, EPS grew 118.2%, free cash flow grew 75.0% and total debt rose 15.3%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow SMC
Summit Midstream Partners, LP (SMC) Piotroski F-score
Summit Midstream Partners, LP's Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 4 out of 9: 4 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, up from 3 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 4 | 1.00 |
| FY2024 | 3 | (2.00) |
| FY2023 | 5 | 3.00 |
| FY2022 | 2 | (1.00) |
| FY2021 | 3 | (2.00) |
| FY2020 | 5 | 0.00 |
| FY2019 | 5 | 1.00 |
| FY2018 | 4 | (2.00) |
| FY2017 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2016 | 6 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (0.82%) | (5.58%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 133.60m | 61.77m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | (0.82%) | (5.58%) | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 153.16m | 197.27m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.43 | 0.40 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 0.55 | 0.68 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 12,133,000 | 10,600,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 46.93% | 49.73% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.24 | 0.18 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 4 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| BROGF Brooge Energy Limited compare | 8 |
| NVGS Navigator Holdings Ltd. compare | 7 |
| KNOP KNOT Offshore Partners LP compare | 7 |
| TK Teekay Corporation Ltd. compare | 6 |
| TEN Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd compare | 5 |
| SMC Summit Midstream Partners, LP | 4 |
| FLNG Flex LNG Ltd. compare | 4 |
| SBR Sabine Royalty Trust compare | — |
| PBT Permian Basin Royalty Trust compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover