Penguin Solutions, Inc.
PENG Technology Information Technology Services
Penguin Solutions, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2026 (year ended August 2026) was $1.7 billion, up 26.5% from fiscal 2025. In the quarter to August 2026, revenue grew 67.7%, EPS grew 1,452.2%, free cash flow fell 128.2% and total debt rose 70.8%, each against the same quarter a year earlier.
Follow PENG
Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG) Piotroski F-score
Penguin Solutions, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2026 is 3 out of 9: 3 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 6 in fiscal 2025.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | 3 | (3.00) |
| FY2025 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2024 | 6 | 3.00 |
| FY2023 | 3 | (3.00) |
| FY2022 | 6 | 1.00 |
| FY2021 | 5 | 2.00 |
| FY2020 | 3 | (2.00) |
| FY2019 | 5 | (2.00) |
| FY2018 | 7 | 1.00 |
| FY2017 | 6 | — |
How fiscal 2026’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 6.87% | 1.00% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (151.91m) | 109.08m | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | 6.87% | 1.00% | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | (303.00m) | 93.62m | Fail | 0 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.33 | 0.29 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.88 | 2.25 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 52,952,000 | 53,154,000 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 27.66% | 28.80% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.79 | 0.89 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 3 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| EXLS ExlService Holdings, Inc. compare | 8 |
| G Genpact Limited compare | 6 |
| KD Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. compare | 6 |
| EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. compare | 6 |
| SAIC Science Applications International Corporation compare | 6 |
| PSN Parsons Corporation compare | 5 |
| CIFR Cipher Digital Inc. compare | 3 |
| PENG Penguin Solutions, Inc. | 3 |
| CHRN ChronoScale Holdings Corporation compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover