Nomad Foods Limited
NOMD Consumer Defensive Packaged Foods
Nomad Foods Limited’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $3.4 billion, up 2.29% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue was flat, EPS fell 2.38%, free cash flow grew 24.2% and total debt rose 14.3%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for three consecutive years, revenue growth for five; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow NOMD
Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) Piotroski F-score
Nomad Foods Limited's Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 5 out of 9: 5 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 7 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 5 | (2.00) |
| FY2024 | 7 | 1.00 |
| FY2023 | 6 | (1.00) |
| FY2022 | 7 | 2.00 |
| FY2021 | 5 | (2.00) |
| FY2020 | 7 | 2.00 |
| FY2019 | 5 | (2.00) |
| FY2018 | 7 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 2.19% | 3.53% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 374.15m | 471.15m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 2.19% | 3.53% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 219.49m | 225.40m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.36 | 0.33 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.07 | 1.10 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 149,861,000 | 161,502,000 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 27.14% | 29.61% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.49 | 0.48 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 5 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| SENEA Seneca Foods Corp. compare | 9 |
| CENT Central Garden & Pet Company compare | 8 |
| CENTA Central Garden & Pet Company compare | 8 |
| UTZ Utz Brands, Inc. compare | 5 |
| HLF Herbalife Ltd compare | 5 |
| NOMD Nomad Foods Limited | 5 |
| JJSF J & J Snack Foods Corp. compare | 4 |
| BRBR BellRing Brands Inc. compare | 4 |
| FLO Flowers Foods, Inc. compare | 3 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover