Moving iMage Technologies, Inc.
MITQ Technology Communication Equipment
Moving iMage Technologies, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2026 (year ended June 2026) was $17.3 million, down 4.57% from fiscal 2025. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 22.7%, EPS fell 89.8%, free cash flow grew 139.9% and total debt fell 3.82%, each against the same quarter a year earlier.
Follow MITQ
Moving iMage Technologies, Inc. (MITQ) Piotroski F-score
Moving iMage Technologies, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2026 is 5 out of 9: 5 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 7 in fiscal 2025.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | 5 | (2.00) |
| FY2025 | 7 | 2.00 |
| FY2024 | 5 | 0.00 |
| FY2023 | 5 | 1.00 |
| FY2022 | 4 | 1.00 |
| FY2021 | 3 | 0.00 |
| FY2020 | 3 | — |
How fiscal 2026’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (3.07%) | (8.86%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (2.47m) | 437.00k | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | (3.07%) | (8.86%) | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | (2.17m) | 1.39m | Fail | 0 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.00 | 0.00 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 2.27 | 1.84 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 9,944,000 | 9,910,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 29.06% | 25.20% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 1.79 | 1.70 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 5 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| MITQ Moving iMage Technologies, Inc. | 5 |
| VISL Vislink Technologies, Inc. compare | 5 |
| CMBMF Cambium Networks Corporation compare | 5 |
| CLRO ClearOne, Inc. compare | 3 |
| SYNX Silynxcom Ltd. compare | 3 |
| FKWL Franklin Wireless Corp. compare | 2 |
| ASNS Actelis Networks, Inc. compare | 2 |
| DZSIQ DZS Inc. compare | 1 |
| UTSI UTStarcom Holdings Corp compare | 1 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover