Franklin Wireless Corp. (FKWL) vs Moving iMage Technologies, Inc. (MITQ)

Franklin Wireless Corp. and Moving iMage Technologies, Inc. are both Communication Equipment companies. Franklin Wireless Corp. is the larger, with a market value of $28.2M against $6.7M — 4.2× the size. Moving iMage Technologies, Inc. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: 0.23% against −22.6%. Moving iMage Technologies, Inc. has the higher net margin (−0.84% vs −2.07%) and the higher return on invested capital (−8.47% vs −39.6%). Across the 18 metrics below, Franklin Wireless Corp. leads on 10 and Moving iMage Technologies, Inc. on 8.

Valuation

Metric FKWL MITQ Communication Equipment median
P/E n/m n/m 33.61
P/S 0.81 0.33 2.16
P/B 0.78 1.26 2.40
Price to free cash flow n/m n/m 25.02
EV/EBITDA 2.92 n/m 13.78
EV/Sales (0.13) 0.22 2.27
Earnings yield (2.49%) (2.53%) (0.65%)
Free cash flow yield (14.29%) (48.83%) 1.61%

Profitability

Metric FKWL MITQ Communication Equipment median
Gross margin 19.25% 28.00% 39.47%
Operating margin (6.25%) (2.03%) 2.39%
Net margin (2.07%) (0.84%) (0.74%)
Free cash flow margin (11.51%) (16.14%) 1.39%
Return on equity (1.94%) (3.18%) (1.91%)
Return on assets (1.45%) (1.57%) (0.20%)
Return on invested capital (39.59%) (8.47%) 0.72%

Growth

Metric FKWL MITQ Communication Equipment median
Revenue growth (TTM) (22.60%) 0.23% 11.48%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) 94.12% 23.08% —
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR (9.30%) 2.09% 4.92%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Health

Metric FKWL MITQ Communication Equipment median
Debt to equity 0.00 0.06 0.06
Current ratio 3.38 2.33 2.01
Net debt to EBITDA 20.28 6.99 0.67

Dividend

Metric FKWL MITQ Communication Equipment median
Dividend yield — — 2.63%
Payout ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00

Size

Metric FKWL MITQ Communication Equipment median
Market cap 28.22m 6.65m 563.45m

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack