LightPath Technologies, Inc.
LPTH Technology Electronic Components
LightPath Technologies, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2026 (year ended June 2026) was $71.7 million, up 92.8% from fiscal 2025. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 73.3%, EPS grew 62.5%, free cash flow fell 171.9% and total debt fell 89.3%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow LPTH
LightPath Technologies, Inc. (LPTH) Piotroski F-score
LightPath Technologies, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2026 is 5 out of 9: 5 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, up from 2 in fiscal 2025.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | 5 | 3.00 |
| FY2025 | 2 | (1.00) |
| FY2024 | 3 | (1.00) |
| FY2023 | 4 | 1.00 |
| FY2022 | 3 | (1.00) |
| FY2021 | 4 | (3.00) |
| FY2020 | 7 | 4.00 |
| FY2019 | 3 | (1.00) |
| FY2018 | 4 | 1.00 |
| FY2017 | 3 | — |
How fiscal 2026’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (14.91%) | (22.95%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (10.23m) | (8.33m) | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | (14.91%) | (22.95%) | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 10.32m | 6.54m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.00 | 0.08 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 4.96 | 1.66 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 53,374,000 | 40,874,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 35.98% | 27.23% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.52 | 0.57 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 5 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| CTS CTS Corporation compare | 8 |
| OPTX Syntec Optics Holdings, Inc. compare | 7 |
| DAKT Daktronics, Inc. compare | 7 |
| RELL Richardson Electronics, Ltd. compare | 7 |
| KOPN Kopin Corporation compare | 5 |
| MEI Methode Electronics, Inc. compare | 5 |
| LPTH LightPath Technologies, Inc. | 5 |
| MPTI M-tron Industries, Inc. compare | 5 |
| LYTS LSI Industries Inc. compare | 4 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover