Intelligent Protection Management Corp.
IPM Technology Software Application
In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 12.9%, EPS fell 25.0% and free cash flow grew 42.7%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow IPM
Intelligent Protection Management Corp. (IPM) Piotroski F-score
Intelligent Protection Management Corp.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 5 out of 9: 5 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, up from 4 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 5 | 1.00 |
| FY2024 | 4 | 0.00 |
| FY2023 | 4 | 2.00 |
| FY2022 | 2 | (2.00) |
| FY2021 | 4 | (4.00) |
| FY2020 | 8 | 6.00 |
| FY2019 | 2 | (2.00) |
| FY2018 | 4 | 0.00 |
| FY2017 | 4 | 1.00 |
| FY2016 | 3 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (9.34%) | (42.39%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 1.08m | (3.02m) | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | (9.34%) | (42.39%) | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 3.03m | 5.41m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.00 | 0.00 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.57 | 3.17 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 13,147,000 | 9,227,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 52.26% | 76.06% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 1.13 | 0.06 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 5 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| RPGL Republic Power Group Limited compare | 8 |
| MNDO MIND C.T.I. Ltd. compare | 5 |
| IPM Intelligent Protection Management Corp. | 5 |
| AIFF Firefly Neuroscience, Inc. compare | 4 |
| IDAI T Stamp Inc. compare | 4 |
| SMSI Smith Micro Software, Inc. compare | 4 |
| YAAS Youxin Technology Ltd compare | 3 |
| AHI Advanced Human Imaging Limited Sponsored ADR compare | 3 |
| YMT Yimutian Inc. - Sponsored ADR compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover