GEN Restaurant Group, Inc.
GENK Consumer Cyclical Restaurants
GEN Restaurant Group, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $212.5 million, up 2.00% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 1.25%, EPS fell 180.0%, free cash flow grew 13.2% and total debt rose 329.9%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Revenue growth for five consecutive years.
Follow GENK
GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. (GENK) Piotroski F-score
GEN Restaurant Group, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 2 out of 9: 2 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 5 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 2 | (3.00) |
| FY2024 | 5 | (2.00) |
| FY2023 | 7 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (1.21%) | 0.28% | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 3.41m | 17.83m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | (1.21%) | 0.28% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 6.44m | 17.24m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.04 | 0.02 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 0.42 | 0.83 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 5,164,000 | 4,668,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 65.28% | 67.02% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.85 | 0.98 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 2 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| BDL Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. compare | 9 |
| RAVE Rave Restaurant Group, Inc. compare | 7 |
| STKS The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. compare | 4 |
| THCH TH International Limited compare | 4 |
| VENU Venu Holding Corporation compare | 3 |
| MB MasterBeef Group compare | 3 |
| HCHL Happy City Holdings Limited compare | 3 |
| NDLS Noodles & Company compare | 3 |
| GENK GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. | 2 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover