Clearway Energy, Inc.
CWEN Utilities Utilities Renewable
Clearway Energy, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $1.4 billion, up 4.23% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to March 2026, revenue grew 18.8%, EPS fell 4,600.0%, free cash flow grew 735.9% and total debt rose 19.6%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for five consecutive years, revenue growth for three.
Follow CWEN
Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN) Piotroski F-score
Clearway Energy, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 4 out of 9: 4 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 5 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 4 | (1.00) |
| FY2024 | 5 | (1.00) |
| FY2023 | 6 | (1.00) |
| FY2022 | 7 | 2.00 |
| FY2021 | 5 | (2.00) |
| FY2020 | 7 | 4.00 |
| FY2019 | 3 | (5.00) |
| FY2018 | 8 | 5.00 |
| FY2017 | 3 | (4.00) |
| FY2016 | 7 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 1.09% | 0.61% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 688.00m | 770.00m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 1.09% | 0.61% | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 519.00m | 682.00m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.51 | 0.47 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.13 | 1.49 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 119,000,000 | 118,000,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 62.91% | 63.46% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.09 | 0.09 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 4 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| BEP Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. compare | 7 |
| AXIAY AXIA Energia compare | 6 |
| RNW ReNew Energy Global PLC compare | 6 |
| EBR.B Eletrobras compare | 6 |
| ORA Ormat Technologies, Inc. compare | 4 |
| CWEN Clearway Energy, Inc. | 4 |
| ENLT Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. compare | 4 |
| XIFR XPLR Infrastructure, LP compare | 4 |
| BEPC Brookfield Renewable Corporation compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover