Abundia Global Impact Group, Inc.
AGIG Utilities Utilities Renewable
Abundia Global Impact Group, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $410,600.00, down 26.7% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 304.4%, EPS fell 30.7%, free cash flow grew 214.4% and total debt rose 10,844.6%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow AGIG
Abundia Global Impact Group, Inc. (AGIG) Altman Z-score
Abundia Global Impact Group, Inc.'s Altman Z-score for fiscal 2025 is −1.99, in the distress zone (below 1.81).
Altman Z-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Altman Z-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −1.99 | (28.18) |
| FY2024 | 26.19 | 7.27 |
| FY2023 | 18.92 | (22.29) |
| FY2022 | 41.21 | 30.70 |
| FY2021 | 10.51 | 8.92 |
| FY2020 | 1.59 | 11.30 |
| FY2019 | −9.71 | (45.78) |
| FY2018 | 36.07 | 3.70 |
| FY2017 | 32.37 | 2.39 |
| FY2016 | 29.97 | (35.27) |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Component | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital / total assets | (0.03) | — | −0.04 | |
| Retained earnings / total assets | (1.45) | — | −2.02 | |
| EBIT / total assets | (0.90) | — | −2.98 | |
| Market value of equity / total liabilities | 5.06 | — | 3.04 | |
| Sales / total assets | 0.01 | — | 0.01 | |
| Altman Z-score | Distress zone | −1.99 | ||
| Z″ Variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies (drops the sales/assets term, uses book equity) | Distress zone | −9.44 | ||
How the Altman Z-score works
Z = 1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets (Altman, 1968). The market value of equity is the close on the last trading day of the fiscal year times weighted basic shares.
Z″ = 6.56 × working capital ÷ total assets + 3.26 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 6.72 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 1.05 × book equity ÷ total liabilities (Altman, Hartzell and Peck, 1995), the variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies.
| Zone | Z | Z″ |
|---|---|---|
| Safe zone | above 2.99 | above 2.60 |
| Grey zone | 1.81–2.99 | 1.10–2.60 |
| Distress zone | below 1.81 | below 1.10 |
Not worked out for banks, insurers and REITs, whose balance sheets the model does not describe, nor when a figure is missing or there is no share price in the week to the fiscal year end.
Altman Z-score against peers
| Company | Altman Z-score |
|---|---|
| BESS Bimergen Energy Corporation compare | 1,023× |
| WAVE Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) Unsponsored ADR compare | 3.8× |
| PBK PowerBank Corporation compare | −0.6× |
| SAFX XCF Global Capital, Inc. compare | −1.1× |
| AGIG Abundia Global Impact Group, Inc. | −2.0× |
| STEM Stem, Inc. compare | −6.7× |
| HTOO Fusion Fuel Green PLC compare | −9.7× |
| NXXT NextNRG Inc. compare | −35.4× |
| VGAS Verde Clean Fuels, Inc. compare | — |
What Altman Z-score is
The Altman Z-Score weighs working capital, retained earnings, operating profit, market value and sales against assets and debts to gauge the risk of distress.
1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets