Siebert Financial Corp.
SIEB Financial Capital Markets
Siebert Financial Corp.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $94.2 million, up 12.3% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 109.6%, EPS grew 93.3%, free cash flow fell 1,855.1% and total debt rose 117.4%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Revenue growth for three consecutive years, operating cash flow growth for three; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow SIEB
Siebert Financial Corp. (SIEB) Piotroski F-score
Siebert Financial Corp.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 4 out of 9: 4 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 6 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 4 | (2.00) |
| FY2024 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2023 | 6 | 4.00 |
| FY2022 | 2 | (4.00) |
| FY2021 | 6 | 2.00 |
| FY2020 | 4 | (1.00) |
| FY2019 | 5 | 1.00 |
| FY2018 | 4 | (3.00) |
| FY2017 | 7 | 2.00 |
| FY2016 | 5 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 0.80% | 2.01% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 10.24m | 10.05m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 0.80% | 2.01% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 5.12m | (3.23m) | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.01 | 0.01 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.10 | 1.15 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 40,363,000 | 39,952,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 97.72% | 98.08% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.15 | 0.13 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 4 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| WTF Waton Financial Limited compare | 5 |
| BMHL Bluemount Holdings Limited compare | 5 |
| DOMH Dominari Holdings Inc. compare | 5 |
| SIEB Siebert Financial Corp. | 4 |
| NCTY The9 Limited compare | 3 |
| GSIW Garden Stage Limited compare | 3 |
| BTCS BTCS Inc. compare | 2 |
| SRL Scully Royalty Ltd. compare | 2 |
| MATH Metalpha Technology Holding Limited compare | 1 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover