PLANET GREEN HOLDINGS CORP.
PLAG Industrials Conglomerates
In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 25,390.3%, EPS grew 27.3%, free cash flow fell 200.7% and total debt fell 99.9%, each against the same quarter a year earlier.
Follow PLAG
PLANET GREEN HOLDINGS CORP. (PLAG) Piotroski F-score
PLANET GREEN HOLDINGS CORP.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 2 out of 9: 2 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 7 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 2 | (5.00) |
| FY2024 | 7 | 5.00 |
| FY2023 | 2 | 0.00 |
| FY2022 | 2 | (1.00) |
| FY2021 | 3 | 1.00 |
| FY2020 | 2 | (2.00) |
| FY2019 | 4 | (2.00) |
| FY2018 | 6 | 2.00 |
| FY2017 | 4 | 2.00 |
| FY2016 | 2 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (151.43%) | (21.54%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (1.79m) | 811.80k | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | (151.43%) | (21.54%) | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 25.19m | 8.14m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.03 | 0.01 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 0.40 | 1.12 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 8,061,800 | 7,282,700 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 3.32% | 11.82% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.17 | 0.14 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 2 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| BOOM DMC Global compare | 5 |
| ALPP Alpine 4 Holdings, Inc. compare | 5 |
| TUSK Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. compare | 5 |
| AIRT Air T, Inc. compare | 5 |
| MAMK MaxsMaking Inc. compare | 4 |
| LGPS LogProstyle Inc. compare | 3 |
| HHS Harte Hanks, Inc. compare | 3 |
| PLAG PLANET GREEN HOLDINGS CORP. | 2 |
| STRR Star Equity Holdings, Inc. compare | 1 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover