Cheniere Energy, Inc.
LNG Energy Oil & Gas Midstream
Cheniere Energy, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $20.0 billion, up 27.2% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 23.5%, EPS grew 100.6%, free cash flow grew 452.2% and total debt rose 6.29%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for five consecutive years; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) Piotroski F-score
Cheniere Energy, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 8 out of 9: 8 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, up from 5 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 8 | 3.00 |
| FY2024 | 5 | (2.00) |
| FY2023 | 7 | (1.00) |
| FY2022 | 8 | 4.00 |
| FY2021 | 4 | (1.00) |
| FY2020 | 5 | (2.00) |
| FY2019 | 7 | 1.00 |
| FY2018 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2017 | 6 | 2.00 |
| FY2016 | 4 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 11.59% | 7.48% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 5.54b | 5.39b | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 11.59% | 7.48% | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 224.00m | 2.14b | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.49 | 0.52 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 0.94 | 1.08 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 219,700,000 | 228,400,000 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 54.37% | 49.83% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.44 | 0.36 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Strong — most fundamentals improved | 8 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 8 |
| MPLX MPLX LP compare | 7 |
| WMB Williams Companies, Inc. (The) compare | 7 |
| TRGP Targa Resources, Inc. compare | 6 |
| EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. compare | 6 |
| KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. compare | 6 |
| TRP TC Energy Corporation compare | 6 |
| OKE ONEOK, Inc. compare | 5 |
| ET Energy Transfer LP compare | 5 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover