JinkoSolar Holding Company Limited
JKS Technology Solar
JinkoSolar Holding Company Limited’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $9.4 billion, down 25.9% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 27.5%, EPS grew 17.5%, free cash flow grew 78.7% and total debt fell 20.4%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow JKS
JinkoSolar Holding Company Limited (JKS) Piotroski F-score
JinkoSolar Holding Company Limited's Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 3 out of 9: 3 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 4 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 3 | (1.00) |
| FY2024 | 4 | (3.00) |
| FY2023 | 7 | 3.00 |
| FY2022 | 4 | 1.00 |
| FY2021 | 3 | (2.00) |
| FY2020 | 5 | (2.00) |
| FY2019 | 7 | 2.00 |
| FY2018 | 5 | 3.00 |
| FY2017 | 2 | (3.00) |
| FY2016 | 5 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (3.69%) | 0.04% | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 154.71m | 2.31b | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | (3.69%) | 0.04% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 790.35m | 2.30b | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.27 | 0.25 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.25 | 1.26 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 52,103,000 | 52,151,900 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 2.15% | 10.90% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.54 | 0.70 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 3 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| TOYO TOYO Co., Ltd. compare | 8 |
| SHLS Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. compare | 6 |
| SEDG SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. compare | 6 |
| TYGO Tigo Energy, Inc. compare | 6 |
| SPWR CSLM Acquisition Corp. compare | 5 |
| ARRY Array Technologies, Inc. compare | 5 |
| DQ DAQO New Energy Corp. compare | 5 |
| RUN Sunrun Inc. compare | 5 |
| JKS JinkoSolar Holding Company Limited | 3 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover