Fidus Investment Corporation
FDUS Financial Asset Management
Fidus Investment Corporation’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $155.9 million, up 6.65% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 8.84%, EPS fell 26.4%, free cash flow fell 205.0% and total debt rose 47.3%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Revenue growth for ten consecutive years.
Follow FDUS
Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) Piotroski F-score
Fidus Investment Corporation's Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 3 out of 9: 3 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, unchanged from fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 3 | 0.00 |
| FY2024 | 3 | (2.00) |
| FY2023 | 5 | 2.00 |
| FY2022 | 3 | (4.00) |
| FY2021 | 7 | 1.00 |
| FY2020 | 6 | 3.00 |
| FY2019 | 3 | (2.00) |
| FY2018 | 5 | 3.00 |
| FY2017 | 2 | (2.00) |
| FY2016 | 4 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 6.36% | 6.94% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (147.00m) | (55.31m) | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | 6.36% | 6.94% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | (229.41m) | (133.60m) | Fail | 0 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.00 | 0.00 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 0.15 | 0.14 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 35,490,000 | 32,585,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 100.00% | 100.00% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.12 | 0.13 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 3 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| PSEC Prospect Capital Corporation compare | 6 |
| VINP Vinci Compass Investments Ltd. compare | 6 |
| VRTS Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. compare | 4 |
| MFIC MidCap Financial Investment Corporation compare | 3 |
| FDUS Fidus Investment Corporation | 3 |
| BUR Burford Capital Limited compare | 2 |
| BCSF Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. compare | 2 |
| KBDC Kayne Anderson BDC, Inc. compare | 1 |
| CGBD Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. compare | 1 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover