Capstone Green Energy Corporation
CEPL Industrials Specialty Industrial Machinery
Capstone Green Energy Corporation’s revenue for fiscal 2026 (year ended March 2026) was $106.0 million, up 23.9% from fiscal 2025. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 10.6%, EPS grew 25.0%, free cash flow grew 362.2% and total debt rose 41.8%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow CEPL
Capstone Green Energy Corporation (CEPL) Piotroski F-score
Capstone Green Energy Corporation's Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2026 is 4 out of 9: 4 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 6 in fiscal 2025.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | 4 | (2.00) |
| FY2025 | 6 | 1.00 |
| FY2024 | 5 | 2.00 |
| FY2023 | 3 | 0.00 |
| FY2022 | 3 | 0.00 |
| FY2021 | 3 | 1.00 |
| FY2020 | 2 | 1.00 |
| FY2019 | 1 | (4.00) |
| FY2018 | 5 | 2.00 |
| FY2017 | 3 | — |
How fiscal 2026’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (71.69%) | (9.04%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (2.53m) | 7.69m | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | (71.69%) | (9.04%) | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 64.25m | 14.88m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.01 | 0.00 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 0.96 | 0.69 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 20,833,000 | 19,056,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 31.95% | 27.23% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 1.14 | 1.08 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 4 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| HURC Hurco Companies, Inc. compare | 6 |
| BWEN Broadwind Energy, Inc. compare | 5 |
| CEPL Capstone Green Energy Corporation | 4 |
| TAYD Taylor Devices, Inc. compare | 4 |
| HUHU HUHUTECH International Group Inc. compare | 3 |
| SHMD SCHMID Group N.V. compare | — |
| FISN DEEP FISSION compare | — |
| HDRN Hadron Energy, Inc. compare | — |
| NWCL Newcleo plc compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover